The predominant knowledge about building is based on the experience of the thousands of years old building culture in different regions. The modern building industry tries to summarize and standardize the experiences in regulations and standards. From an economic point of view in the present this can be useful. The normative period of use becomes shorter and during the construction of the buildings, construction costs and energy can be saved in terms of construction time, use of materials and renovation. In contrast, in the past, buildings were built longer and more durable for the inhabitants and buildings that were better for the environment, which could also be used by the next generation. Today, the master builder is only a vicarious agent of the respective politics and ideologies.
There is never secure knowledge. There are only theories which are disproved in order to create new theories.
Not only in politics is it easy to lead people behind the light, much harder it is to explain to people that they have been or will be led behind the light. Examples are the hole in the ozone layer, dying forests, oil reserves, man-made global warming, the ban on diesel and above all our history. If humans do not know their history, they are much easier to control and manipulate. An interesting article on this topic Megaliths by Andre Viktorwisch.
At the moment we are experiencing a profit-oriented and bought contract science. It is moving more and more towards a transformative science (the abolition of objective-neutral science) in the process of the "Great Transformation", which includes a resource, mobility, food, consumption and industry turnaround.
Humanity needs a new form of science. Too many dogmas have been created so that there is no chance for groundbreaking discoveries. For about 200 years nothing fundamentally new has been invented or discovered. Everything that is declared as an invention today is only a further development of what has already been discovered or inventions.
As long as research and teaching is done according to the dual patterns of thought, hardly any significant progress will be made. This is only possible again with the application of trinary approaches.
Our entire science and society is materially oriented. Matter conditions the spirit. So if the brain does not exist, consciousness or spirit cannot exist. It's hard to understand that it's the other way around. The mind conditions the perceived matter (wave patterns that turn information into definitions). Through the material view, many connections in our nature cannot be recognized. A building is not only a statically calculated and designed structure, but also forms a harmony with nature, or in the majority of cases does not, and is thus a hostile storage place for us humans.
An increase in knowledge on the part of colleges and universities is hardly to be expected, since the majority of research topics are sponsored by industry and only those results are published that serve the interests of the sponsor or current policy. The desired results then also determine the content of teaching. The chair holder must essentially adhere to these guidelines in order not to jeopardise his or her existence./p>
The days of value-neutral research at universities and institutes are long gone. If, for example, the Potsdam Institute for Klimafolgeforschung e. V. did not use a simulated computer program to conjure up a catastrophic climate change caused by man, the association would receive considerably less funding. Otherwise the climate researchers would have to join the ranks of job seekers at the Federal Employment Agency. I have full understanding for the employees who do everything possible to ensure that the sources of funds do not dry up.
The well-trained lobbyists are helpful to the elected representatives and thus entrepreneurial interests are cleverly implemented politically. It would be very astonishing if the representatives from the economy in the standards committees would incorporate interests not related to their companies into the standards.
Why do we hear very few critical voices from the research and scientific community. If a university professor expresses opinions contrary to the official media policy, his or her future career path will not only be stony, but also ostracized. He endangers his career or even risks being expelled.
Ethically clean science is increasingly being replaced by authoritarian science.
In addition to this selected quotations:
Prof. Claus Turtur: "Scientists have the reputation of being knowledgeable, in order not to jeopardize their good reputation, they deal with things they know and avoid things they know nothing about. Therefore, science limits itself to known facts and prevents new unknown knowledge."
Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder: "The current organization of academic research rewards scientists when they work on topics that are productive and popular. Careful methods and cautious conclusions are neither productive nor popular." Lecture at the University of Stuttgart "What goes wrong in current physics?" from 14.5.2019
Correction factors were also invented in building physics in Germany in order to achieve the desired results in thermal insulation. The inventive genius of some of the chair holders is astonishing, in order to keep their well-paid jobs.
Historically, knowledge was lost through "accidental" fires of old libraries and epidemics. Almost simultaneously, the libraries of Alexandria, Athens and Tsargrad (Constantinople) as well as the Etruscan library in Rome were burned down. Or the libraries of the Grand Prince of Kiev Yaroslav I. Vladimirovich, called the Wise (978-1054) and the Grand Prince of Moscow and Tsar Ivan IV. Vasilievich the Terrible (1530-1584) disappeared without a trace.
Likewise, with the destruction of the city of Asgard Iryisky (temple city) today Omsk 1530 a great treasure of ancient knowledge was destroyed. Such examples can be enumerated until today.
Especially the green zeitgeist leaves deep traces in the defacement of our homeland, damage to the natural environment and contributes to the destruction of our business location. For example, uneconomical windmills on every hill or the destruction of German building culture through Styrofoam facades.
Saving energy is right, but not at the expense of our valuable environment and the health of its inhabitants. Ecologically healthy housing can only be created and maintained by the safe provision of inexpensive energy. At the same time, however, it also safeguards national prosperity.
Germany has one of the most expensive energies in the world due to the energy turnaround. The German economy is primarily geared towards exports. How long the industry will be able to withstand international competition with this price difference is only a question of time. Some of the energy-intensive industries are already gone, see the consequences of the energy turnaround.
The science magazine that is still about real science!
Das Wissenschaftsmagazin, in dem es noch um richtige Wissenschaft geht!.
1. The current building trend is determined by the eco-industrial complex.
2. Energy saving and the renovation of old residential buildings.
3. What is an energy saving house?
4. The policy provides for houses and flats that make people ill.
5. Which is the right residence?
6. Build a house ecologically and economically.
7. The building culture and construction
8. If you build your own home, then the building laws must be observed!
9. A home of our own for the protection of our family and our health or just a capital investment?
10. Find the right information in the jungle of building information.
11. You as a builder-owner have to finance all building measures and conditions!
12. The wrong housing construction and the housing shortage
13. How is knowledge generated in the construction sector?